.

Sequester Budget Cuts Could Cost GCPS $3.4 Million, School Superintendent Says

The White House has released a state-by-state breakdown of what the budget cuts could mean. In Gwinnett County, school district officials say its means losing critical dollars for Title I programs.

Gwinnett County Public Schools officials have released a statement regarding the impending across-the-board federal budget cuts, known as sequestration.

In the statement, GCPS Superintendent J. Alvin Wilbanks, said the cuts would cost the state's largest school district approximately $3.4 million, Title I monies, and allocations for special education. (Read the full statement below.)

Earlier this month, board members Carole Boyce and Mary Kay Murphy traveled to Washington, D.C., to fight the budget cuts. And, now the White House has released a breakdown showing that teacher jobs and funding to education children with disabilities will be hampered.

The cuts are slated to take effect Friday, March 1.

In Georgia, according to the White House, that would mean the state loses approximately $28.6 million in funding for primary and secondary education, putting around 390 teacher and aide jobs at risk.

In addition about 54,000 fewer students would be served and approximately 80 fewer schools would receive funding. In addition, Georgia will lose approximately $17.5 million in funds for about 210 teachers, aides, and staff who help children with disabilities.

J. Alvin Wilbanks' Statement on Sequestration:

"Sequestration would have an impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools as we
anticipate it would result in an approximate $3.4 million loss to the
district.

The two largest cuts would be seen in our Title I grant - approximately $1.7 million and our IDEA Section 611 special education grant -- approximately $1.3 million. The district does not anticipate an immediate issue with services as a result of the loss of Title I funds as we will be able to reserve funds from this year to carry into next year.

The funds from the IDEA Section 611 grant are primarily used to pay salaries for our special education paraprofessionals. If these federal dollars are lost, the district would look to fund these positions out of our local budget. The use of local funds to offset or cover costs of programs affected by sequestration provides additional challenges to school district budgets that already are stretched thin."

See other Gwinnett County school stories:

  • (Video) Gwinnett Students Wow at Regional Science Fair
  • Outdoor Learning Center for School in Gwinnett
  • All of Gwinnett's High Schools Are Named AP Honor Schools
  • Gwinnett Schools' Counselors of the Year Announced


GMP February 26, 2013 at 12:29 PM
Why is it that they wait till the last minute and all of a sudden it becomes a crisis. Then they pull on the emotions of the public , I love this quote. " the children will suffer, the country will go into turmoil. So answer me this, they made us take a 2% cut in jan. , basically they told us to suck it up. Now 50 cent a gallon increase in fuel, now according to the Bloomberg report their looking at our 401 k . When will the spending stop. We are robbing over 45 cents of every dollar from our grandchildren , does that count as hurting and making children suffer. I will gladly cut back as long as I see Washington make real cuts. Cause people, once we hit 20 trillion you better be prepared , Europe wasn't .
"B" February 26, 2013 at 01:46 PM
Greg - I so agree! The threats of "the children will suffer" is a scare tactic to avoid real spending cuts. Our State and Federal government need to "suck it up and implement the spending cuts" just like we individual Americans have had to do. The Government (State & Federal) need to learn to live within their "budget"! Oh, yes - I forgot - this President doesn't have a budget in over 4# years.
Good Grief Y'all February 26, 2013 at 10:51 PM
The President has proposed a budget every year, on time. The House hasn't passed it or their own. Maybe the NRA and gun lobby can make up some of the cuts to schools. They have very deep pockets.
"B" February 26, 2013 at 11:46 PM
My response to "Good Grief Y'all" Obama never passed a budget The Spokesman-Review August 27, 2012 President Barack Obama will be the first president in this great country who will not have passed a budget in his first term of office. He submitted a budget that was defeated by a vote of 97-0. Not a single Democrat or Republican voted for it.
Good Grief Y'all February 27, 2013 at 12:00 AM
The President doesn't pass a budget. He proposes a budget which the Congress either passes or doesn't. If the Congress doesn't like the President's proposal, they write their own, pass it and send to the WH. The House is in charge of the budget passing stuff, along with spending and paying the bills Congress already approved by law.
S. Pine February 27, 2013 at 01:03 AM
We as a country cannot continue to borrow 46 cents of every dollar. Government has made us too dependant on them and we must cut spending. We need to freeze growth and audit each agency and cut 1% from each budget.
Chris P February 27, 2013 at 01:51 AM
GGY I understand that you are committed Obama supporter and you are entitled to your opinion but you are not entitled to your own set of facts. The Republican controlled has passed a budget bill every year since 2011 and that budget is then promptly tabled by Senate Majority Leadrer Harry Reid (D) Nevada. The entire blame lies squarely on the shoulders of the Democrats in the Senate who have not even debated, never mind passed a budget.
"B" February 27, 2013 at 02:47 AM
Good Grief Y'all - are the facts clear NOW!
Good Grief Y'all February 27, 2013 at 11:57 AM
Uh, oh, Chris P, we're both wrong - me a little bit, you a lot. The President doesn't actually sign the budget, but he did sign the Budget Control Act: http://democrats.senate.gov/2012/01/24/fact-sheet-responding-to-republican-no-budget-claims/ "It is wrong to assert that there is no budget. The Budget Control Act enacted in August contained the budget for this year. It was passed by both the House and Senate, signed by the President, and enacted into law."
Good Grief Y'all February 27, 2013 at 12:05 PM
Excuse me while I decide to go with what the experts and scholars say. "That vote: 97-0 against. Democrats didn’t support the plan because it has been supplanted by another deficit-reduction plan Obama had later outlined. Republican leaders demanded a vote on Obama’s budget to show that Democrats don’t support any detailed budget blueprint, according to The Hill. Such votes are taken 'just as a means of embarrassing the president and his party,'said Patrick Louis Knudsen, a senior fellow with the conservative Heritage Foundation. (NOTE: conservative Heritage Foundation) 'Usually it’s brought up by the opposition party because they generally anticipate that a president’s budget won’t get very much support especially if it has controversial elements to it,' he said. Other experts agree. Said Steve Ellis, of Taxpayers for Common Sense: 'That was pure political theater and was done to score rhetorical points.' And Norman Ornstein, a scholar with the conservative American Enterprise Institute, said, 'it doesn’t mean a damn thing. It’s only a symbolic gesture.' (NOTE: a scholar with the conservative American Enterprise Institute) http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/apr/06/mitt-romney/romney-says-obama-failed-pass-budget/
Good Grief Y'all February 27, 2013 at 12:07 PM
Yes, they ARE! :D
Good Grief Y'all February 27, 2013 at 12:08 PM
Smh again at the "Pending Approval" gremlins. Posted last night: Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC): "We'll criticize everything he does," Graham acknowledged. "We'll say, 'Mr. President, it is now up to you to find this $85 billion in savings and we'll say it’s to make it easier for you.' But every decision he’ll make, we'll criticize." http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/25/lindsey-graham-sequester_n_2762133.html
Good Grief Y'all February 27, 2013 at 12:13 PM
From the Politifact article cited above: " . . . the job of passing a budget resolution is not the president’s. That responsibility falls to Congress, and even then the president doesn’t sign it. As Ellis, our expert, put it: 'The president has no role in passing a budget. The president can cajole Congress about passing a budget and advocate for positions and funding levels, but in the end, Congress approves the budget resolution for their own purposes.' That’s the difference between this and other claims we’ve rated which blamed Congress for inaction on the budget."
"B" February 27, 2013 at 08:31 PM
We need to be reminded: "The President proposes the sequester himself and now that the date has come for it to be implemented, he is less to be blamed? Does anyone research anything, or take time to understand the issues and how they get here? The American electorate's intelligence has never been lower. Or, everyone agrees that spending should be cut, but nobody wants to see their program on the list. We need adults and people willing to sacrifice."

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »