Former Youth Pastor and Little League Coach Charged With Child Molestation

Loganville police confirm that Stacy Lee Everett, charged with child molestation and sexual battery, was at one time a youth pastor and Little League coach in Walton County.

A former Little League football couch and youth pastor was arrested in Hall County Aug. 23 and brought to Walton County to face charges of child molestation.

According to Lt. Mike Westbrooks of the , Stacy Lee Everett, 42, of Covington, is charged with one count each of child molestation, felony sexual battery, cruelty to children and false imprisonment. Westbrooks said the charges stem from an investigation that began out of state.

"The victim, who is now 14 years old, was 12 at the time of the incident," Westbrooks said, adding the incident is alleged to have taken place within the Loganville city limits two years ago, which is why it is being handled by the LPD.

Westbrooks also confirmed that prior to 2007, Everett was the youth pastor at a Walton County church but his ordainship was revoked following a 2007 arrest for an unrelated incident.

"He also coached Little League football in Walton County prior to  2007," Westbrooks said.

Everett was picked up from the Hall County detention center by Walton County authorities yesterday and is now being held in Walton County.

(This information was obtained from the Loganville Police Department. It does not indicate a conviction.)

Victor August 31, 2011 at 06:34 PM
Interestingly enough, Mr. Everett's ex-wife on whom he bestowed 18 years of terror and abuse has no idea who you so called old friends are; in fact, in all that time she never heard your names. Moreover, if you understood abuse then you would understand that it is usually bestowed upon its victims privately, and behind closed doors.Once again, why don't you help your old buddy out and post his $105,000.00 bond.
cindy lou August 31, 2011 at 06:35 PM
speaking for michelle, she may have not seen but I sure did. Let me say that you never know a person until you live with them. I witnessed Stacy mistreat this woman many times, not just her but his animals. I know the way he acted toward his kids and any human being for that matter. And for the record stacy did not leave this woman, he actually forced his way back several times. She finally after being fed up from his abuse, finally worked up enough courage to kick him out. Which was a pretty brave move after how scared she was of him. I see you are one of the people who he has manipulated and fooled. Funny how every story he tells always involves him being the victim of some "crazy woman" Are you going to be the next victim or wise up to his brainwashing? Or are you going to be fooled by him for 5 years putting up with his abuse because youre too scared to stand up to him?Remember abuse usually STARTS verbally and mentally and escalates from there.
cindy lou August 31, 2011 at 06:39 PM
I agree victor, I know that any friends he had, he lost after treating them bad, lying to them, manipulating them, using them, etc. Stacy cannot keep close friends because they figure out how he truly is. And after hearing his stories about his ex wife and other stories about ppl, its funny how much he can turn around and make the other person seem like the bad guy and him the victim, Ha!
Jeff August 31, 2011 at 06:46 PM
I guess you know that the dissemination of his criminal history is not exactly legal?! And, at this point, he may have a case against YOU civilly for doing so? Tell us how you were able to get this information from GCIC, Victor? I sure hope you're not in law enforcement because if you are, you won't be for much longer!
Amy C. August 31, 2011 at 06:53 PM
Victor, let me ask you. If you are so full of conviction and fully believe the things you are accusing, why don't you use your real name?
Amy C. August 31, 2011 at 06:59 PM
I completely agree with you Jeff, but I wasn't going to say anything. I was just gonna sit back and watch Mr. "Victor" hang himself.
Amy C. August 31, 2011 at 07:06 PM
Oh and by the way, in the state of GA, bond in usually refused in child molestation cases so the sheer fact that he was given bond at all speaks leaps and bounds on his behalf. Thank you for emphasizing that on here numerous times.
cindy lou August 31, 2011 at 07:08 PM
his criminal history is a public record for anyone to see. All you have to do is look up his name.
A Friend August 31, 2011 at 07:11 PM
Because, should "Victor" use his real name, the light of the matter would come out full force. And you don't want that, do you Victor?
cindy lou August 31, 2011 at 07:13 PM
while we're on the subject of bond, its actually "well over that amount" according to the jail, The fact that they set bond so unbelievably high is because noone is going to pay that much and they know that. Now that speaks leaps and bounds for him
A Friend August 31, 2011 at 07:19 PM
"Victor", "Victor", "Victor".....shame on you. You do know how to distort the facts to your benefit, don't you? What are you hiding under the rock you crawled out from??? hmmmmmmmm.......................................
Amy C. August 31, 2011 at 07:19 PM
Yes, Cindy Lou, it is. However, what "Victor" just posted above is NOT accurate as he's just stated that Stacy was already found guilty of the charges against him now and you of all people should know that's not true, right "Cindy Lou"?
Amy C. August 31, 2011 at 07:23 PM
I absolutely agree Barbara. Especially with an emphasis on "a disgruntled ex spouse".
cindy lou August 31, 2011 at 07:24 PM
Im sorry " me of all people" dont quite understand that comment but...
cindy lou August 31, 2011 at 07:28 PM
I dont see where he stated that he was already convicted of it, all he said was how many counts he has against him. I dont believe thats a lie
A Friend August 31, 2011 at 07:29 PM
FYI Cindy Lou....his bail is $105,000. And another FYI: yes, there are people who believe that Stacy is not guilty of these charges and willing to pay the bond. There is always TWO sides to a story.
cindy lou August 31, 2011 at 07:37 PM
I was under that impression also until informed otherwise
A Friend August 31, 2011 at 07:39 PM
Well then Cindy Lou, you don't know how to read a sentence. It says he plead guilty.............children ( you can fill in the blank with all the rest of the garbage). So yes, Victor is stating inaccurate information. But then again, that is probably his point.
cindy lou August 31, 2011 at 07:45 PM
the sentence states( copy and pasted) "2008 plead guilty to charges POINTING A PISTOL AT ANOTHER AND FAMILY VIOLENCE BATTERY" I believe that is what he was saying he plead guilty for and then he started another sentence. I do know how to read a sentence I just havent mastered the misconscrewing information yet but thanks
A Friend August 31, 2011 at 07:52 PM
Yes, but it makes a big difference whether the comma is used or a period is used. One small mistake (intended or not) changes the whole meaning, now doesn't it???? And this applies in more ways than just a , or a .
THERESA August 31, 2011 at 10:04 PM
I just want to throw out a fact on here, and I am so sure that Vic and Cindy lou all know, with all of their legal intelligence and all, I can at any time of my choosing, go and swear out a warrant for YOUR arrest for any crime of MY choosing, and have you locked up and ruin YOUR reputation at any time. Our good ole justice system is flawed and this is one of many examples of this. So, Vic and Cindy lou, if you are going to spit out statements, especially hear say statements, keep that little fact in mind. That mean ole karma stick you all talk about swings both ways....
Victor August 31, 2011 at 10:31 PM
Amy C, when a colon is used it typically means that there is a list to follow, and as such, the commas are used to separate items in the list; therefore, the commas in my post do not imply that Mr. Everett has plead guilty to all the charges, and nor did I. Moreover, Mr. Everett,s information is a matter of Public Record and available to all that truly want to know his background, and criminal history. Also, recent legislation has changed the way that bonds are issued in Georgia; therefore, because of these new legislative changes, and not due to the leaps and bounds of their character,child molesters are allowed bond, and once again this is also a matter of Public Record.
Victor August 31, 2011 at 10:41 PM
A. Friend, A. Friend,A.Friend, Victor is my name and I know all to well about Mr. Everett. Anyway, A. Friend is that really "YOUR NAME", or you hiding under the proverbial rock that you spoke of in your post. Come on tell us your real name, or are you to ashamed to be associated with your good buddy Mr. Everett.
Victor August 31, 2011 at 10:43 PM
Oh well,Victor is signing off, so God Bless us all, and to all a good night.
Victor August 31, 2011 at 10:54 PM
Not hearsay Theresa, there has to be probable cause to make an arrest,so from now on, just the facts, and only the facts.O.K.
A Friend August 31, 2011 at 10:58 PM
According to the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, Mr. Stacy Lee Everett: NO RECORDS FOUND. He may have misdeamenors, he may have had motions filed, he may have "charges" filed. But I will have to agree with Theresa, I could file a motion against YOU, Victor, however unless you are found guilty, then they are just pieces of paper. BTW, I believe he plead "no contest" on the misdeamenor, which is not an admission of guilt.
A Friend August 31, 2011 at 11:15 PM
No, I am not ashamed, however, I know what the person behind this (perhaps yourself) is capable of.................................
Amy C. September 01, 2011 at 12:40 AM
Victor, as usual, you're running your mouth before knowing what you're talking about. I'm not the one that was talking about punctuation, however, yes, a colon implies a list is coming, but when you don't specify that he was charged, convicted, or is alleged to have done it, etc and you start the paragraph with "STACY LEE EVERETT, what a guy! Let's see how great:" and you post the things you posted, you ARE implying he has been convicted of these crimes and you are liable for slander. But thats all symantics. What makes me laugh is that you posted your reply wayyyy down here instead of under the statement that sparked your response in the first place. Hmmm, to be such a know it all, you sure aren't very organized.
Victor September 01, 2011 at 12:53 AM
case number:08CR 1104-3 Plea of guilty : Acknowledgement and Waiver of Rights In The Superior Court Of Walton County,State of Georgia State of Georgia vs Stacy Lee Everett Hardly a plea of no contest, and I assure you that I am not Gene Gore, but your comment regarding Mr. Gore appears to be threatening and slanderous. Incidentally, I never mentioned the Georgia Bureau of Investigation and would be surprised if they published their information for the the general public.So perhaps in the future you should do your own research of Public Records and not rely on information that is supplied to you by your "Friend". B.T.W.it appears that you have taken this quite personally and defensively,far more aggressively than just a friend.Were you a party to this mess with Mr. Everett and do you have something to hide? It seems that you can make assumptions and randomly slander names, but yet your credibility is in question because you will not reveal who you are; either way, your identity could likely be revealed as this case comes to fruition.BOTTOM LINE THERE WAS NO PLEA OF NO CONTEST IT WAS A PLEA OF GUILTY.
Amy C. September 01, 2011 at 01:02 AM
You are exactly right Theresa. Unfortunately it appears that "Victor" isn't intelligent enough to realize a fact if it bit him on the face. "Victor", an allegation is just that, an allegation. There is no substantial evidence or proof behind it, nor is it deemed the truth. It is simply someone stating that a certain crime or crimes occurred. Once reported to the police they have to apprehend the person who allegedly did the crime and then the legal process begins. Near the end of the loooong drawn out process AND in the event that the case actually even makes it to trial, the Plantiff then bears the burden of proving to a jury, BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT, that the accused actually did what he or she is being accused of doing. In this case, at this point, it is hearsay. One person is saying he did it, he's saying he didn't. It's one person's word against another’s. And that, my dear, IS the facts.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »