The other day I was driving in my car listening to NPR. I happen to like NPR because they do longform news stories as opposed to just quick hit news that gets repeated every 15 minutes. (I also like listening to their reporters' voices; they have some people with good pipes. It's a weird thing of mine. Sue me.) As I was listening, I heard a story on a deal that President Obama's campaign has offered to the Romney campaign.
Release the past five years of your tax returns, and we won't ask for any more.
That was it. That was the deal. And the more I listened to the story (and it's commentary), the more I thought: this is stupid. On multiple levels.
I'll leave it for you to parse out just how asinine this "deal" is, but I want to move on to my gut reaction. I posted this on Facebook and it turned into a very long comment thread. After hearing this story, my first thought was simply:
I wish Romney would just come out and say, "You know what? I have exploited every loophole in the tax code in order to pay as little tax as possible, because it's good business and perfectly legal. If you don't like it, then let's light a fire under Congress' butt and get the tax code changed to something that makes sense for everybody."
I said it then, and I'll say it now: if Romney came out with that kind of honesty, I'd vote for the man just on the strength of that statement alone. Because instead of playing to perceptions, the man would be dealing in facts. And that's the kind of president I want.
Heck, I'd take that level of honesty from any politician, regardless of party affiliation.
Unfortunately, this will never happen. Politics has become marketing and nothing more. Spin. Damage control. Attack ads. Response to attack ads. What does your running mate say about you? Does charcoal gray make you look official or does it make you look stuffy? How many likes can your Facebook page get?
I laughed when I read the slew of articles suggesting that the selection of Paul Ryan made this a campaign about substance over style. Really? The fact that the main point of the articles was that picking Ryan "said" this was a substantive campaign merely illustrates my point.
Bring me the politician crazy enough to lay everything on the table and say, "Go ahead. Look around. Tell me what you like and what you don't like. Pick away at my past, my mistakes, my faults, my fears. Because when you do that, you'll get to the core of who I am as a person, and that will tell you far more about how I will govern than any stump speech ever will."
How refreshing would that be? Imagine a candidate on one of the talking head shows, sitting there with nothing to hide, answering tough questions instead of obfuscating and spinning?
Talking Head: I see that when you were in college you smoked weed. Is that true?
Honest Politician: Yes.
TH: Uh, did you like it?
HP: At the time.
TH: Do you still smoke weed?
HP: No.
TH: Uh...um... (pause) Okay. Next question. You made a lot of money. Did you pay taxes on it?
HP: Yes.
TH: Did you pay a lot of taxes on it?
HP: No, because the tax code sucks.
And so on. Perhaps I'm just weird, but I would find that scintillating to watch simply because it would actually matter. It would tell me something about the person running for office, something I could hang my hat on.
Instead, I get stories about deals over issues that don't tell me anything. Sure, Romney's tax records may reveal that he didn't pay taxes and got away with it, but other than stoking the fires of jealousy among folks who paid taxes and wish they didn't or didn't pay taxes but got caught, what's the point of that information? That he's filthy rich? Didn't I already know that? And isn't just about everyone who runs for office at that level of government?
We're a nation in need of leaders who can offer solutions, not just soundbites. Who can bring leadership and common sense to bear on the challenges that face us. We are in desperate need of someone who can look at both sides of the aisle, call them on their ideological manure and inspire them to do what is right for the majority of Americans. Someone who can speak with honesty and clarity about the issues we face and the necessary changes we would all have to make in order to make this nation truly united.
Give me one honest politician. Just one. That's all I ask.
Too bad Abe Lincoln is off hunting vampires. We could use him in the White House again.
Good Grief! It's a good thing you don't make ANY decisions in our government George. You must eat, sleep and dream about government 24/7. In the case of Obama, I agree with you. The voters were smoking crack but in the case of TSPLOST, the voters were awake. Completely different voters mentality than those who trust in Hope and Change. Sweet Dreams George
Corruption in Georgia stretches from the golden dome to the county courthouse and all controlled by Republicans. Some examples: 1.Senator Bob Balfours false expense reports 2.House speaker David Ralston's family vacation trip to Europe ($17,000) paid for by lobbyist 3.Recent bribery issues with our own local county commissioners 4.Road being built close to former Gov. Perdue's property 5.Numerous tax exemptions given away to corporations as an example, Delta gets a sales tax exemption on sales tax for fuel...no other business does. I have many more examples but you get the idea.Check out "ATLANTA UNFILTERED"on the Web.
http://buford.patch.com/blog_posts/accountability-ethics-reform-decision
Republicans complain that Democrats and Obama have not cleaned up the mess Republicans created quickly enough and told alot of verifiable lies in the process.Also picture Clint Eastwood with a voucher shopping for medical insurance to replace Medicare.See you in Charlotte.
Despite their frequently expressed laissez-faire beliefs, many Republican Governors have each presided over deals in which huge sums of taxpayer money have been handed over to large corporations in the name of economic development. The Romney campaign,had its convention themes delivered by some of the biggest proponents of corporate welfare. South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley gave praise to Boeing, saying that her state "was blessed to welcome a great American company that chose to stay in our country to continue to do business." She failed to mention that Boeing's decision to locate its second Dreamliner assembly line in Charleston was more than a little influenced by a state and local subsidy package estimated to be worth more than $900 million. Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell -- who told the convention "Big government didn't build America!" -- agreed to give up to $14 million in subsidies to Northrop Grumman to relocate its headquarters to northern Virginia. The move was motivated by a need to be near the company's big customer, the Pentagon, so the subsidies were probably unnecessary and could be seen as a reward for the large contributions the company made to his election campaign. Ohio Gov. John Kasich, demands by companies threatening to move their operations out of state unless they got big subsidy deals. Kasich's administration negotiated $100 million packages with both Diebold Inc. and American Greetings Corp.I could site many more.
And, Dave, injecting anti-intellectualism into a discussion?????? Go read that again. He was saying that the average hard working man is something to be proud of. You had a problem with that??? Oh wait...lol
I do my job the best that i can and people pay me for my skills. I don't get paid much, so my dividends come from the satisfaction I get for doing my job well. Of course, it does bite a bit when my pocketbook gets raided by federal politicians for yet another tax.
Your comments make no sense to me and also attempts to distort and juxtaposition my remarks. Please read again. I'm not sure you understand. These new voter suppression laws are of a great concern not only to minorities but to everyone that believes in democracy. For a better understanding just google "VOTER ID LAWS" as a starter. More later.
Period!
I cannot explain this using $64.00 words so I will keep it short instead. I have lived all over the US and have met very few people who don't possess an ID. Those few people did not possess an ID for nefarious reasons, NOT because they were Black or Green or Yellow. Now, does it not seem strange to you that your party feels they need the votes of people who are unaccountable to win an election for our President? Is that not one of the most suspicious things you have ever heard of? You say this policy is racist. Are you saying Black people are less likely to have ID? Why is that? Because they are Black? Isn't that a pretty negative thing to say about Black people? Has your tie cut off circulation to your head? What, exactly is wrong with you?
George Wilson 4:46 pm on Thursday, August 30, 2012 Understanding the demographics of the Republican convention: 1.Social Conservatives 2.Plutocrats 3.Aggrieved whites (Talk radio listeners) 4.DixieRepubs (former Dixiecrats) Some similarities with # 3 5.Token Hispanic,women,and African Americans (we need to get a little market share of these groups)
"The definition of tokenism: "The policy of attempting to meet certain obligations or conditions by symbolic or token efforts" George, isn't this what Obama is doing by giving illegal immigrants deferred status?
The Republicans have figured out that one way to suppress the traditional Democratic vote is to require photo ID to vote.Let me use the state of Pennsylvania as an example where about 750,000 voters are affected.About 437000 minority, and elderly,voters don't drive a car in Philadelphia they use public transportation and therefore do not have a drivers license (picture ID)They will have to get one. All kinds of stories are immerging how difficult this is, but I'll just give you just one. A person was delivered by a midwife in South Carolina and never had a birth certificate .He migrated to Philadelphia and used public transportation. He has no picture ID but had voted for many years.He will now have to get a picture ID but a birth certificate is required and he doesn;t have one.Hence he cannot vote. There are many other stories like this. The Republican speaker in Pennsylvania even bragged about this as an excellent tool to suppress the Democratic vote. The excuse for these laws was to prevent voter fraud even through no cases had been reported in Pennsylvania. These laws mainly affect students, minorities, and the elderly.On a positive note ,the courts have struck down some of these voter ID laws as being unconstitutional in Texas, Alabama, and parts of Florida .Keep in mind ,that these right wing tactics are being pushed by an organization known as ALEC (American Legislative Executive Council) funded by people like the Koch brothers and big corporations.
I agree and please read my comment on "Corporate Welfare".
Republicans have advanced photo ID legislation in at least 35 states. If these 35 states enact a photo ID law, they collectively will spend at least $276 million, and possibly as much as $828 million, in the first four years alone. At a time when states are experiencing huge budget shortfalls, it would be an enormous waste to spend hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to disenfranchise voters as the Republicans are trying to do.
I have no problem with a voter ID card but they should be free and easy to get. The state should devote all the resources to insure that the groups most affected not only have a voter ID card but are registered to vote as well. The requirements should be to not put an undue burden on the citizens as some states have tried to do. Our problem is not people voting illegally. It is low voter turnout ,look at the last election.
"From what I've seen, your posts show more intelligence and understanding than those of some college-educated idiots I've seen." Dave was putting down an education which I personally value highly.One of the brightest minds in our country was a man named Eric Hoffman.He was a self educated dock worker in California.He wrote many books.One I remember very well was called "The True Believer". I would suggest that you read the book.
Argumentum Ad Hominen is a fallacy in argument .Either argue the point or quit with the school yard blather. It hurts your credibility.
The author is ERIC HOFFER sorry I was in a hurry.
You can spout numbers all you want but can you give me a name of someone you know that does not have an ID? Your argument is empty and without any semblance of substance. Again, the only people I have ever met who had no ID have been people of nefarious character. What kind of a candidate cannot win an election without the votes of people who are unverifiable? What are we supposed to think of this kind of candidate? Can you get real for just a minute?
The federal government should be the least of your concerns when you live in the reportedly most corrupt state (ranking #50 out of 50) in the U.S. http://www.foxbusiness.com/investing/2012/03/22/americas-most-corrupt-states/