patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices

Eroding the American Dream

Deals made by people with a stake, struck under the table, are being exposed. Amidst election fervor and the sweltering heat of Georgia, expecting lethargy beyond casting votes, there is perhaps hope. The election news moves between a moral political economy tethering on votes and jobs, switching the discourse from 1 percent to 99 percent of subsets of citizens.

When citizens are depending on food stamps, unemployment benefits, and Meals on Wheels, there is no sight near of Super Political Action Committee (PAC) dollar fatigue. It is electoral decadence and a profound governing system error that $10 million dollars from an individual donor is going to supporting one candidate – presumptive Republican Presidential nominee Mitt Romney, when there are 46 million people living on food stamps and additionally 44 million living in poverty in America.

Not to forget, there is a Federal budget deficit of $1 trillion and a debt burden of over $15.7 trillion. Palpably resonating like the third world, the statistics give the impression that we are talking about Bihar, in India. Is the American Dream eroding?

If in America, a family must survive on $10 per day with unemployment benefit of $300 per month, then it is not surprising that in Bihar in India vendors sell garlic by pods. Bihar, touted as the bad example of poor governance, at least has seen a lot of progress lately. Déjà vu, vote is bought in Patna, the main city of Bihar. Money can buy power, position and votes. Ethics is also for sale. Sons of elected officials peddle with drugs, drive fancy cars, and buy off jail sentences and visit massage parlors. It is also a third world reality.

America, with its transformational foreign policy with 3 Ds – defense, diplomacy and development has managed to ship jobs overseas, taking the country to the cleaners. Meanwhile, Bihar is at least making some tangible progress. Even though Bihar lags behind in human and economic development, it is commendable that Bihar became renowned as the least corrupt State in India in 2011.

Misuse of money – ‘corruption’ pervasively legalized and legitimized is certainly one of the culprits of poor governance. Newspaper headlines in metro Atlanta reverberating sounds of scandals, corruption, massage parlors, schools cheating, land deals, water projects, and the jobless – the American Dream feels like it is eroding. When the economy is failing citizens, poverty gaps become prominent, and eyes are on governments and governance – both big and small.

The recent corruption charges of one of the Gwinnett County Commissioner, Shirley Lasseter is revealing on several fronts. In this particular case, the local authorities sought help from federal investigators. Lasseter pleaded guilty to accepting $36,500 in favor of her vote towards a zoning project. Subsequently, the involvement of her son and the nexus of illegal money, drugs and land deals all came into unfolding within the same scandal.

The murmurs beneath the surface are telling of a county rife with corruption which prompted concerned local authorities in seeking assistance from federal investigators. Upon suspicion, at the local level, corruption in smaller figures is much easier to contain and deal with. However, to act on suspicious activity requires political will from people with stake. As shown by Lasseter’s scandal, seeking collaborative programs during times of uncertainty, actually demonstrates results.

Whether Super PAC dollars or a smaller amount of bribe that tempts an elected official – the question remains, can money be used as powerful incentives in governing, creating policies and acting on behalf of the people? This is a sad and dichotomous reality of the U.S. political economy. On the one hand, this guiding of the moral economy is visible and permeates various levels of governing structure and system.

On the other hand, the rising level of poverty in America is frightening. Disparities are stark. ‘Perseverance’ is the new American Dream for citizens. The basic value construct of what America stands for – equality, rights, justice, fairness and opportunity, appear to be on transitory hold. Nevertheless, like Bihar, Georgia is also working on improving its corruption index and has a long way to go. Acting on reducing systematized rent-seeking purchasing power in governance will require political will, similarly to resurrecting the American Dream with policies that actually benefit people.

Will the big and small governments work together in rebuilding internal democracy? Will Obama offer an economic agenda that can get the country moving beyond the basic need economic survival mode to reshaping its moral political economy? We will cast the vote for hope.

Jimmy

1:17 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012

In 2004, George Soros donated a total of nearly $24 million to several different political groups with the stated goal of defeating GW Bush...Can you link us to your blog complaining of that electoral decadence? Or is your outrage selectively applied to Republican donors only?

Reply

Blue Streak

2:27 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012

I would think that all citizens would be concerned with corruption and the future of our ability to provide jobs. There is no need to take this post personally and dig up a counterpoint. One of our nation's biggest problems is that we cheer on political parties as if they are rival high school football teams. Corruption is bad wherever it is and no matter who it involves. Let's just focus on that thought.

Reply

Bernie

4:20 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Very good point Blue Streak. The classic elementary school yard whine "but they did it first", the teenagerish "but everybody is doing it", and the false equivalencies which abound on the media and take the place of real and substantive political conversation. Jimmy - so do you agree with the way money is being spent on the electoral process or not? Many on the left, most in the middle and a few on the right would agree with Amreetas analysis. What do you think about the content of the blog?
- without outsourcing blame - unless you've written a blog about the subject you'd like to share.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jimmy

5:59 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Gentlemen, I didn’t take the post personally, actually I found it a little confusing…It bounces around from Americans on unemployment to corrupt sons of Indian politicians to county commissioners taking bribes, but not without first trying to somehow tie superpac donations on Romney’s behalf to the number of people using food stamps, the poverty level, the federal deficit and the debt…
To answer your question specifically Bernie, no I’m not particularly impressed with the way money is being spent on the political process in this country- by either side. To answer the question I think you are alluding to- yes, I think the Citizens United case was correct. McCain- Feingold was a terrible piece of legislation that should never have been passed and deserved to be overturned. Perhaps a future congress can figure out a better way to do it…

Sherilu

10:03 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Jimmy, I don't think you understood what you read. You simply played a childish game. Your response only solidifies what Ms. Regmi wrote.

The blog is absolutely correct in it's assertion of back room deals and money buying not only access but the government itself. When a county commissioner can be bought off with a measly $35,000 + we are in deep trouble. Instead of "taking sides" it would be refreshing to actually see some problem solving by mature people. I do think that there are many of these people in our government, but they are tainted by the rest. So, what do we do? We take the time to study beyond the "talking points" and honestly assess what we want our county and country to be. Honest, civil disagreements can be parlayed into "consensus" if we act maturely and as a community.

Reply

Jason Green

12:07 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

This analysis is complex and touches upon several trajectories of "misuse of money" in governing and governance. The impact of political economy further influences lives of citizens. Reference to 3Ds, foreign policy of development, defense and diplomacy, brain child of GW Bush and Condy Rice, of course has also contributed in negatively impacting the economy. Reference to India is interesting. The image of the U.S. overseas, land of equal opportunity and a fair society, as U.S. teaches good governance abroad, in reality is misleading. U.S. faces very similar problems than those facing the developing countries. Unfortunately, the land of equal opportunity has not yet developed adequate resilience to counter the repercussions of globalization as resources revolve so much around its moral political economy. In summary, what it translates to is perseverance by citizens to achieveing their American Dream, when those that govern are oblivious to the ground reality. It is time for consensus not only in Congress but also between Congress and Local legislatures.

Reply

Daniel Plainview

2:11 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

Will Obama offer an economic agenda that can get the country moving beyond the basic need economic survival mode to reshaping its moral political economy? Moral political economy- Did we ever have one? I won't get into that, but I know Romney will be a G.W. Bush clone: pro trickle down economics, and haphazard foreign and domestic policy.

Reply

Karsten Torch

6:01 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012

To be fair, I didn't see anything that reflects specifically on GOP or Dems, just on the political process in general, which I agree with. Corporatism needs to be reigned in. Why Congress members are allowed to participate in insider trading without repercussions is beyond me. That being said, I also see a reference to the disparity between income groups. I find this increases the more dependant we get on government. The more handouts we give, the less incentivized people become to provide for themselves. Just my 2 cent's worth.....

Reply

Neil Stapley

9:57 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

There is so much money flying around with the constant electionering, back room deals, media politics etc. Each special interests use loopholes in the constitution or the right vs left view of the constitution for their own purpose and because the politicians then don't have to be accountable for what is being said let the whole mess continue. If there were strict controls on when campaigning could be done prior to elections and a ban on these so called super pacs. Campaign only 4 weeks prior to an election.

Reply

Leave a comment