By now we've all seen the now famous Time Magazine cover that sent shock waves rippling through the media.
A mom stands as her pre-school aged son perches on a chair and practically hangs from her naked breast. The words "Are You Mom Enough?"scream in bright red letters beside the breastfeeding pair. The actual article focused on attachment parenting, particularly extended breastfeeding.
Attachment parenting, which was coined by Dr. William Sears, author of “The Baby Book”, encourages breast-feeding (sometimes extended to toddlerhood), co-sleeping and “baby wearing." Parents who practice this parenting style believe that children should be comforted when they cry and don't enforce any "cry it out" methods.
Many people were offended by seeing a preschool aged child nurse. Some breastfeeding advocates were offended by the brash stance the mother held. Angry moms took to the Internet and flooded Twitter and Facebook to debate if the article was awesome or terrible. It seemed that everybody had an opinion and most people were not happy with the way that Attachment Style Parents were portrayed.
Obviously, the folks over at Time Magazine hit a nerve. I have to be honest, when I saw the cover I felt a little--meh--for lack of a better word. The sight of an older child breastfeeding really doesn't shock me.
Perhaps it's because one of my dearest friends nursed her daughter until she was 3 years old. It was normal to see her little girl scamper over and request to "nursie." I often saw her stretched out on my friend's lap, her little legs dangling as she nursed. Of course, I never once saw them breastfeed while standing and staring at me militantly like the woman on the magazine cover.
The photograph was so calculated that my second thought was, there's no way that they ever nurse like that in reality. Where was the tenderness that passes between mother and child when they nurse? Why weren't they touching? They took something natural and made it look weird. It was just so glaringly obvious that the cover was created to shock the world and we were being manipulated.
My suspicions were confirmed when I watched a Toady Show clip that featured the mom who was in the photo, Jamie Lynne Grumet, and her son Arum talking about the controversial magazine cover with Savannah Guthrie.
"This isn't how we breastfeed at home," she says. "It's more of a cradling, nurturing situation. I do understand why Time chose this picture because…it did create such a media craze to get the dialogue talking.”
They certainly did get people talking. Let me just say that I am an attachment style parent, but I am not militant about it. I didn't base my decision on any advice taken from Dr. Sears but because my son needed me to parent him that way.
I wore him in a sling as a baby because he cried hysterically if I put him down. We co-slept with him because he slept better in bed with us and sleep is precious when you have a cranky infant. We breastfed until he weaned himself at a young 8 months old but I would have gone longer if he wanted to.
The funny thing is that my second son doesn't want me to use the attachment method with him at all. I tried to "wear" him as an infant but he preferred to play on a blanket on the floor. I attempted to co-sleep with him but he wanted space and loved sleeping alone in his crib. We did nurse for a very special 18 months and then one day he was done and he never latched on again.
I parent each of my children differently and according to their needs. The truth is, that I think it's unfortunate that Time Magazine played on the guilt that some moms feel about possibly not "being mom enough" for their kids. I am the mom my children need me to be, not who I want to be or feel pressured to be by society.
As long as they are happy and adjusted, I could care less what "The Baby Book" or Time Magazine has to say on the subject.
What do you think of the magazine cover? Did it make you question if you are "mom enough" to your children? Please share your thoughts and experiences in the comments.
Gail Moore
12:43 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Leigh, I think you found just the right answer for those of us who had such varying degrees of emotions when the cover hit. Each child is different and trying to fit parenting into a specific model is just asking for controversy (and Time did that really well!). I do remember when my children were younger that I second guessed myself sometimes based on what I had experienced with my own parents or with friends with children. So it's good to know there are varying types of successful parents for the myriad types of kids who will rule the world some day!
Leigh Hewett
6:44 pm on Thursday, May 17, 2012
It's all too easy to second guess ourselves as parents. Time did do a really good job on preying on that fear.
tiffanie
1:30 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
That cover/article certainly didn't make me wonder if I was "Mom Enough." More, it just irritated me that a parenting style was made to seem so extreme! I never planned to cosleep or any of that business, but, like you, was presented with a first born child who would not sleep longer than 20 minutes in his crib and was coined "Colonel Fusster" by everyone around him during the day. So, you bet your bottom I was excited to read Dr. Sears and be given the "permission" to hold him and sleep with him in my bed! I also only planned to nurse him for a year and ended up going until 2 1/2!! Like, you, Leigh, my daughter was opposite. She did not want to be held and slept better alone. She also decided to stop nursing cold turkey at 18 months!! Funny enough, at age three, she asks to nurse all the time..obviously, I can't help her there!
Anyway, I just thought the whole thing was ridiculous. Anyone who has birthed more than one child should understand that everyone, every child, every family is different. If there was really only one way to do things, there wouldn't be so many damn books about it. It really isn't a contest. We're all just trying to figure out what works for our families.
And, aside from a few jerks here and there, the "Mommy Wars" is just media hype. I really don't spend any of my extra time deciding if another mom is "mom enough". Only a**holes do that, and they were judging you before they were a mommy anyway!! :)
Leigh Hewett
6:46 pm on Thursday, May 17, 2012
I feel bad for the moms who feel pressured to enter the "contest" that the media has created. Like you, I rarely spend my time judging other moms.
Athens Mama
1:50 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
I agree with the above reflections. I have 2 kids, and they couldn't be more different. I subscribe to the AP philosophy, but I also think you have to do what works as you parent, and be confident in your decisions if you are coming from a base of love. I do think all that "Are you Mom enough?" garbage is just that.....however, I had no problems with the picture and was aghast at the suggestions of "child pornography" by some who reacted to the photo. If people have a hard time seeing a young looking, attractive Mom breastfeeding her 3 year old, I think they should relax over this non-issue. I know there is an argument for the cradling and nurturing postures of breastfeeding, but I also know that the older my kids got, the harder it was to have them lay down in the "baby" position to nurse or get their diapers changed. I changed plenty of diapers with my kids standing up, and I can remember my son, who was 2 at the time, waving at the mailman while he nursed. (we were in my backyard) I'd rather see a million more covers of Moms, of any age, shape, look, breastfeeding than the covers that don't get done - of snot covered kids sitting in their bouncy seats because they are sick and infrequently attended at daycare.
Leigh Hewett
6:47 pm on Thursday, May 17, 2012
I'm sure that the mailman was excited to pass by your house. :)
Caroline U
2:41 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
I LOVED THIS ARTICLE! I know my font is all caps but that's because you so eloquently put into words everything I think about my own mothering AND about this whole TIME cover thing.
Seriously, Leigh. This article is good enough to be in The NY Times and beyond. I've read just about every article from every viewpoint out there and loved this to pieces. LOVED it. This is an important piece.
Leigh Hewett
6:48 pm on Thursday, May 17, 2012
Thanks Caroline! I appreciate your support and comments more than you know!
Jesse
5:41 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Thank God! Finally a sound judgement on that absurd cover. You are so right, we need to be the Mom that our kids need and the whole "Mommy Wars" thing is a load of crap. If more women thought like you, the world would be filled with confident and capable moms. Thank you for writing this.
Erin Lashley
9:25 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
I think the Time article is most valuable for having made so many people realize that they were being purposefully antagonized by said article.
Leigh Hewett
6:48 pm on Thursday, May 17, 2012
Well said, Erin. You crack me up!
Julie Crowe
10:07 am on Thursday, May 17, 2012
I personally feel there is WAY too much pressure on moms these days to be superwoman, work, mother, domestic godness, all while staying a nice size 6 and looking sexy. The mere title of this article offends me. I don't think our mothers worried so much about doing everything little thing right and being perfect like we do. Blah. :)
Leigh Hewett
6:49 pm on Thursday, May 17, 2012
I'm sure that the popularity of social media has added to that pressure.
Dave Emanuel
11:27 am on Thursday, May 17, 2012
I think all women-- and men-- should be offended by the Time article and cover. The main stream media (often called the lame stream media for good reason) has a penchant for categorizing people within a group and then treating that group as a monolith. In so doing, they minimize the importance of the individual traits that make everyone different. So when someone poses the question, "Are you mom enough?" and asks it within the context of a "mother monolith", they are actually trying to minimize your individuality and place you within their preconceived parameters. Such questions are nothing more than insults that don't even deserve consideration, let alone an answer.
Leigh Hewett
6:58 pm on Thursday, May 17, 2012
I found the whole thing just too glaringly obvious to let myself get too worked up about it. Dismissive is how I felt about the whole thing but I can see why some people would be offended. No one wants to feel like their individuality is being minimized. Honestly though, I don't tend to search for my identity in magazines.
Becky
12:54 pm on Thursday, May 17, 2012
I don't know any moms who have read only one book or used only one style. You are exactly right, we do what is best for each child. While the article brings attachment parenting to light, I don't think any good purpose is served by the combination of that photo and headline. It's odd that people find the "method" of just being in tune with your child extreme in any way.
Leigh Hewett
7:00 pm on Thursday, May 17, 2012
Good point Becky! AP is such a loving and connected method, it's a shame that it has a bad reputation.